At those words it collapses, the great pink square of mass hit the floor with a thud and broke into dozens of parts, wet shag, huge teeth, even the crown fell and hit the floor, a perfect 2 dimensional object, totally immovable from where it fell. In the heart of the broken pile of matter there was a large egg that immediately fractures and from it sprang a mass of tendrils that weaved into a human form, though much taller than the average human. They incorporated pieces of the broken shell like armour, on the chest, pelvis and head, arms and legs. Accenting joints and such. It's head was not wholly unhuman with the typical features marked by depressions and protrusions but all through it the red veins worked in and out of it. Knitting the being together. It all happened in maybe a second and a half before it stood there in front of Reynard as if nothing peculiar had happened at all. "CHOICE IS ALL, ACTION IS. GOOD IS IDEALS, MALLEABLE, SUBJECTIVE, YOU ASK A QUESTION IN IT. WHAT IS GOOD?" Two answers would be better than one. The other timeline would grant this one perspective. It however did not perceive of this, it merely knew it had asked the same question twice and that it asked both at the same time to different people in different realities.
no subject
In the heart of the broken pile of matter there was a large egg that immediately fractures and from it sprang a mass of tendrils that weaved into a human form, though much taller than the average human. They incorporated pieces of the broken shell like armour, on the chest, pelvis and head, arms and legs. Accenting joints and such.
It's head was not wholly unhuman with the typical features marked by depressions and protrusions but all through it the red veins worked in and out of it. Knitting the being together.
It all happened in maybe a second and a half before it stood there in front of Reynard as if nothing peculiar had happened at all.
"CHOICE IS ALL, ACTION IS. GOOD IS IDEALS, MALLEABLE, SUBJECTIVE, YOU ASK A QUESTION IN IT. WHAT IS GOOD?"
Two answers would be better than one. The other timeline would grant this one perspective. It however did not perceive of this, it merely knew it had asked the same question twice and that it asked both at the same time to different people in different realities.